The 2014 budget debate by the House of
Representatives resumed on Tuesday with members kicking against
the votes for some subheads planned by the Federal Government.Such votes include the N971bn
earmarked for fuel subsidy, N700m for a hospital in the Presidential
Villa and the N63bn voted for amnesty programme and N7bn for National
Conference.
Among the lawmakers that raised the
issues were the Chairman, House Committee on Diaspora Affairs, Mrs.
Abike Dabiri-Erewa; the Deputy Minority Leader, Mr. Suleiman Kawu; and
Rafikat Onobamiro.
Dabiri-Erewa, in her contribution,
noted that the government had through this year’s budget again proved
that the large amount it spent on the maintenance of the nation’s
refineries in 2013 was a waste.
According to her, the N971bn voted for fuel subsidy is a clear pointer that the refineries are still not working.
She added, “The N971bn voted for fuel
subsidy is way too high. Are they saying that the refineries are not
working after a large amount was spent on their maintenance in 2013?
“This provision for fuel subsidy should be reviewed.
“They are also going to spend N700m on a hospital in the Villa when ordinary Nigerians have no access to health care.
“What about the national conference? They want to spend N7bn; we have to review all these proposals.”
Another lawmaker, Betty Apiafi,
supported the speedy passage of the budget, but she called for the
urgent passage of the Petroleum Industry Bill as well.
She said, “Oil revenue will continue to
leak until we pass the PIB. The NNPC is no longer accountable and the
solution lies in the PIB.”
There were other lawmakers, including Mr. Sunday Karimi, who urged the House to pass the budget without delaying it.
Karimi cited the budget of the
education sector, saying that the 14 per cent provision this year was
closer to the 26 per cent recommended by UNESCO for countries globally.
He also said there were 26 federal roads adequately covered by the budget.
Kawu, who queried the N912bn budget
deficit, observed that while the sum total of the budget was N4.6tn,
government’s revenue projection was N3.7tn.
“Mr. Speaker, it is very obvious that
there is a huge deficit here. Therefore, we have to critically examine
this budget and review a lot of the provisions”, Kawu added.
In her contribution to the debate,
Onobamiro wondered why N63bn would be voted for amnesty programme in
the Niger Delta when water provision for the whole country has a vote
of N37bn.
“We are faced with a situation of
insecurity in this country; look at the money they voted for the
Army, Navy and the Air Force, it is too small. Budget of the whole Air
Force is not enough to buy one aircraft for their operations.
“But, here we are, government is
spending N63bn on youths and ex-militants in the Niger Delta alone. What
about unemployment challenge facing the entire country?”, she asked.
Another member, Mr. Abubakar Momoh, said the budget came with a high borrowing cost of over N700m.
“The money budgeted for debt servicing
is high; there is also the issue of highways like the Lokoja-Benin
Highway, there is no adequate provision for it.
“At best, the paltry sum budgeted for that road can only complete three kilometres”, he said.
Before the debate commenced, the
six-member advisory committee, which the House set up on Tuesday last
week to guide it on whether members should debate the budget or not,
submitted its report.
The committee confirmed that the Minister of Finance, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, breached the Fiscal Responsibility Act, 2007.
It said the minister breached the Act
by failing to attach the details of the budget of the 31 government
agencies listed under the law to the 2014 budget currently before the
National Assembly.
The committee noted that Okonjo-Iweala
failed to comply with the provision of Section 21(II) of the Act,
which requires that the details of the budget of the agencies be
attached to the nation’s budget for consideration by the National
Assembly.
Among the agencies considered as “big
earners and spenders,” are the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation,
Central Bank of Nigeria, and the Nigerian Ports Authority.
The report observed that what the
minister attached to the appropriation bill was the “summary” of the
budget of the agencies and not the detailed breakdown as required by
law.
“As a committee, the documents attached
to the budget do not fulfil the requirement of the Act because they
contain just the summary.
“Section 39 of the Act even says a
breach of the Act is criminal”, the Chairman of the committee and
chairman, House Committee on Rules/Business, Mr. Albert Sam-Tsokwa,
told the House.
However, the committee recommended that
the budget debate should go on “in the national interest” so long as
Okonjo-Iweala provided the details before the budget passage.
The committee argued that in spite of
the established breach of the Act, the House would not stop the budget
debate because it was equally an obligation under Section 81 of the 1999
Constitution for the House to pass the budget.
Sam-Tsokwa spoke further, “The breach of
the Act was by the minister; there was a clear breach and the minister
has to properly provide those details in compliance with Section 21 of
the Act.
“It is the conclusion of the committee
that the budget debate will go on for national interest while the
minister complies with the law.”
Ruling on the report, the Speaker, Mr.
Aminu Tambuwal, said the point of order raised by a member of the All
Progressives Congress, Mr. Emmanuel Jime, was “sustained.”
It was Jime’s point of order that stalled the debate last week, as he had observed that the budget was in breach of the Act.
Tambuwal ruled that the report would guide the House as members debated the budget.
The speaker had blamed the rush with
which the budget was sent to the National Assembly without the details
of the agencies on the jostling for political positions ahead of 2015.
But, he assured Nigerians that the
House members would not forego “patriotism” or “lose their heads” like
those jostling for power.
The debate will continue on Wednesday (today).
PUNCH
No comments:
Post a Comment